Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Edgar's avatar

I like the approach you gave to this conundrum that free will is. A kind of "middle way" (as in Buddhism). I too see it as a tug of war, as it were, between our acknowledgment that complete free will is an illusion and our input or sense of agency. Neither goes all the way.

After reading scientist Robert Sapolsky's book Determined and learning from other thinkers such as Sam Harris or philosopher Alex O'Connor, one can not avoid but conclude that we should be very careful, compassionate and unbiased (easier said than done) towards other's behaviours, reactions and interactions on a day to day basis. None of us are in complete control of our feelings and actions. We are, at least in part, darwinian robots with biological algorithms with some agency.

There are several cases where people become killers or sexual predators after having a quite normal life because brain tumours affect areas in their brains that "made them do heinous actions" or hindered their inhibition to act in such a way.

Judges that judge more harshly in court if they haven't had a meal (low glucose levels) is another example, among hundreds.

Blind belief in a God-given free will is common in Mexico since Catholicism predominates. Extreme (and sometimes unjustified) punishment is the result, such as eternal damnation in Hell.

Lets understand ourselves and, in extension, one another.

Indeed, a thought provoking topic.

Thanks Rob!

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts